Who are you for? Black people, brown people, white people, pink people, rainbow people – all of the above? And what are you against? Aren't they often the very individuals we just claimed to support? Have we, perhaps, shifted our focus from the human to the group? Is it possible that our true opposition lies in a shared concept: we are against the one who acts with malice, the individual who chooses unkindness – the asshole?

Are we concerned with someone's faith, their nationality, or the large digits in their bank account? Or is the more fundamental truth this: as long as you approach the world without being an asshole, you are one of us. We believe in championing positivity not through rigid definitions of right and wrong, but through a simple, universally understood principle: just don't be an asshole.

Can clothing be a quiet yet powerful declaration? A subtle rebellion against the expected, an embrace of our spirit?

In a world too often fractured by division, can a positive choice become an act of defiance? If we wear love, do we not push back against the shadows of hate?

We're not interested in adding drama to a conflict. There's already too much drama in our world. Instead, what if what we wear becomes a quiet affirmation of the good? A tangible expression of joy, a subtle act of defiance against the pervasive negativity.

In a digital age where echo chambers amplify division and loyalty to "sides" often trumps empathy, what if we instead championed the very essence of what we all crave: peace? Isn't adding anger to conflict akin to dousing a fragile flame with gasoline? Doesn't choosing sides often risk alienating the very individuals we hope to reach?

What if, instead of aligning with division, we united under the banner of collective love? Could "Love En Masse" become a potent catalyst for change, a quiet yet resounding call for unity in a world desperately seeking connection?